[language-switcher]
BXTA logo

PrecisionPoint™

Transperineal Access System – revolutionising the methodology for obtaining prostate biopsies

BXTA is on a mission to educate the world on the benefits of LATP prostate biopsy: transperineal biopsies carried out under local anaesthetic.

As the sole distributor, outside North America, for the PrecisionPoint™ single use device, that enables LATP, and alongside international partners that including organisations such as the British Association of Urological Surgeons, The Royal Society of Medicine, Prostate Cancer UK, The British Association of Urological Nurses and many others, we are committed to eradicating the current ‘de facto’ standard method for prostate cancer diagnosis: the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided or transrectal biopsy.

PP Device gif

Early and accurate detection of prostate cancer is proven to widen the available treatment options to patients, improving outcomes whilst reducing potential adverse side-effects.

Yet, TRUS biopsy has a high risk of infection, including patients given prophylaxis medication. In a recent study, 7 of 564 patients who received TRUS were admitted to the hospital for infection within the first 7 days, compared to 1 of 562 patients for LATP. At 4 months, 13 patients who received TRUS had required hospital admission, compared to 6 patients who had received LATP1. The alternative transperineal or template (TP) biopsy has, in the past, typically only been available to men at greater risk of infection from certain medical conditions, and had to be done under general anaesthetic because of the need for multiple biopsy punctures

The PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System is now revolutionising the methodology for obtaining prostate biopsies. Not only does it take full advantage of the transperineal path, decreasing risk of infections, it allows for more thorough sampling of all regions of the prostate including those difficult to access with the transrectal approach2

PrecisionPoint™ provides a free-hand experience for HCP to operate in local anaesthetic settings, potentially aiding hospitals with limited resources.

The benefits

  • Convenient freehand, easy to learn
  • Decreases risk of sepsis over the transrectal approach, removing the necessity for routine antibiotic use thereby decreasing the risks of the spread of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms3
  • Allows systematic template-style sampling without the need for a template or stepper and stabilizer unit4
  • Performed under local anaesthesia, so the procedure can be undertaken in an outpatient clinic
Paclaging Device

Transrectal vs. Transperineal

By passing the biopsy needle through the perineum instead of the rectum, the risks associated with the transrectal approach are reduced. The practitioner is not restricted to biopsy locations dictated by a grid configuration, since the technique is freehand. The practitioner can freely manoeuvre the ultrasound probe to align the access needle to target the desired locations with certainty for targeted and systematic biopsies.

PrecisionPoint™ represents a novel approach for urologist to obtain samples in difficult areas of the prostate5 compared to TRUS procedures, through it’s ability to systematically allow access to the whole of the gland.

Regional Training Centres

BXTA is working with leading urologists, clinical nurse specialists and thought leaders in the field of prostate cancer diagnosis to eradicate TRUS biopsy, in favour of LATP as the new standard of care.

We have established regional centres of clinical excellence across Europe, Australia and New Zealand, as part of an international training programme designed to increase the number of consultants, registrars and clinical nurse specialists skilled in this new advanced prostate biopsy technique.

Click here to listen to Professor Peter Heathcote discussing options in prostate biopsy

References

  1. Local anaesthetic transperineal biopsy versus transrectal prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection (TRANSLATE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Richard J Bryant, Ioana R Marian, Roxanne Williams, J Francisco Lopez, Claudia Mercader, Mutie Raslan, et al. The Lancet Oncology, Volume 26, Issue 5, 583 – 59, 2025.
  2. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Uleri A, Baboudjian M, Tedde A, Gallioli A, Long-Depaquit T, Palou J, et al. Eur Urol Oncol. Dec;6(6):621-628, 2023.
  3. EXIT from TRansrectal prostate biopsies (TREXIT): sepsis rates of transrectal biopsy with rectal swab culture guided antimicrobials versus freehand transperineal biopsy. Newman, T.H., Stroman, L., Hadjipavlou, M. Haque, A., Rusere, J., Chan, K., et al. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 25, 283–287, 2022
  4. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Utilizing the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System vs a Grid Template: An Assessment of Outcomes. Buller D, Lin F, Wagner J, Antony M, Staff I, McLaughlin T, Tortora J, et al. Urology. 2025
  5. Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? Bott SR, Young MP, Kellett MJ, Parkinson MC. BJU Int. Jun;89(9):886-9. 2002

Join the conversation

Have you been diagnosed with prostate cancer?

We’d appreciate 5 minutes of your time to answer our questionnaire